Breakfast in the Deep End

In tough economic times, perception often becomes reality in the business world - and leaving the office at 3:30PM every day can lead to certain perceptions, in certain people, that aren’t that conducive to ongoing employment. For a long time, I arrived at the office at 6:30AM every morning, and headed out each day between 3:30 and 4:00PM. It worked great - I got a quiet hour-or-so to myself in the morning (often my most productive hour of the day) and I got to enjoy some extra free time in the afternoon.

Sadly, when the economy decided to take a turn for the crapper, and rumors of layoffs and pay cuts started floating around General Motors, I was rightly advised to return to a normal schedule. (OK, now here comes the point of this whole story) But if I ever get the opportunity to go back to those sanctimonious early-morning arrivals, I want to sit at my desk, answer my e-mails, and eat a breakfast like this. Every. Single. Day.

No, not the New York Times and webcomics part. The part about the steel-cut oats, vanilla, pumpkin seeds, dates and raisins. I can practically smell it as I type this…

Sweet Tooth: Sugar Relativity

Sugar cubes

If you’re one of the millions of people out there trying to lose weight, or one of the countless others just shooting for that deliciously-indeterminate goal of living healthier, you might be surprised to learn just how easy it is to cut down on the amount of sugar you consume. Whether it’s corn syrup, cane sugar or one of the myriad zero-cal test-tube sweeteners out there, I’ve found it’s surprisingly easy to train your taste buds to work with less of it.

In the past couple of years, Kelly and I have been steadily becoming more active, between late-night racquetball games at the local college, various flavors of bicycling, running, and getting our money’s worth from our home gym. During this time, we’ve tried out equally as many options for rehydration - from Nalgene bottles filled with Brita water, to bottled spring water, to Gatorade and other flavored options. Our favorite by far was Vitamin Water, and the Wegman’s private-label equivalent - because they were sweetened with natural sugar.

The problem with drinks like these, however, is that an entire bottle has as many calories as a large snack - and if you drink 2 or 3 bottles per day, you might as well eat another meal! My solution? Kill two birds with one stone: mix the flavored water with filtered tap water. In addition to cutting your calories by 50%, you also double your drinks-per-dollar. But what about the taste?

Surprisingly, after just a couple of days spent drinking the “watered-down water”, we both got used to the less-intense taste … to the point that now, the undiluted stuff actually tastes way too sweet! The same approach has worked with other beverages, too - we now dilute store-bought juices 50/50, and mix powdered drinks (like our current favorite, Arnold Palmer tea/lemonade mix from AriZona) at one-third strength. The the even-cooler part? Turning down the sweet-factor in your drinks seems to amplify it in other places. Take coffee, for example - I no longer need to add sweetener or sugar to my coffee, because the natural sweetness of the cream (well, half-and-half) is a lot more noticeable. These are the same sugars that are enhanced by steaming milk for cappuccinos and lattes.

Maybe we could call it the daverea.com challenge: On an average day, total up the calories (or chemicals) you consume in liquid form. Then, try dropping that number by 50%, just by diluting your cold drinks and cutting back on added sweeteners in your coffee and tea. If you give it a week, I think you’ll be amazed by what your taste buds tell you!

Photo assist

Despite my “big camera” being banned from our live music enjoyment last night, we did manage to get a few photos of the night’s talent, thanks to Pauley’s iPhone:

Hard to believe you can pack the voices of Patsy Cline, Janis Joplin and Aretha Franklin into that gem of the Rochester music scene, but somehow Teagan managed to cover them all - superbly. Though Katy’s theory is that Teagan just swallowed Aretha…

(And no, Katy is not glaring at Pauley’s photographic efforts in that 2nd pic … she just seems to look like that sometimes when she’s playing. And no, that is not a chamber pot on the floor (despite the band’s musings on its possible uses) … it was supposed to be a tip jar!)

1-minute-post #2

From bikes, beer and burritos, tonight we shift gears - and head to Lovin’ Cup to check out Teagan and the Tweeds with the Katy Wright Band.

I know these 1-minute posts must seem (at least a little bit) like a sad attempt at “tweeting” by a person who has actively avoided Twitter - but really they’re simply borne of a desire to say something in this space, superimposed with a distinct absence of time in which to say it.

1-minute-post #1

It’s night. The curtain of the horizon has closed over the sun, and soon my headlights will be cutting through moonless darkness. I’ll join others who share one mission:

Meet up. Ride bikes. Drink beer. Go home.

It promises be a good night.

shifting the blame…

By now, unless you’ve been living under a rock in the computing world, I hope you’ve heard about Conficker.

Richard Adhikari over at TechNewsWorld has heard about it too - in fact, he just published an article about Conficker’s latest endeavors, which are apparently leaving the computing world’s security experts baffled. But there was one quote in the article that really stuck in my craw:

Here’s the painful truth: Conficker would not be anywhere near as effective as it is in growing if PC users had only kept up with their updates and patches. It leverages a vulnerability mentioned in Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) More about Microsoft Security Bulletin MS08-067, which was published last October.

Sadly, Adhikari gets it all wrong. You don’t blame users for a security hole that should never have existed in the first place. If we were to discover a major defect in an automotive product, we wouldn’t blame the drivers of the affected cars - we’d blame the manufacturer and the designer. Remember - Conficker isn’t a computer explot, it’s a Windows exploit - and were it not for the swiss-cheese security of the Windows product, Conficker wouldn’t exist.

If we’re going to toss blame around, it’s put it where it’s due: at the feet of the Redmond Giant.

News Flash: New York Times actually gets something right

ace_of_spades_by_terraldo

Over the last few weeks, LinuxToday editor-in-chief Carla Schroeder has been understandably critical of old media. In reporting on outbreaks of Windows-exploiting viruses and malware, they’ve consistently failed to call a spade a spade, and explain the root cause: “It’s Windows malware, not computer malware!” (emphasis mine)

Well, it seems our friends over at the New York Times finally got a fact straight: in reporting on the Conficker worm, they gave us the straight story - and even threw in a little extra, unsolicited but very tasty nugget of truth at the end…

Conficker is a program that is spread by exploiting several weaknesses in Microsoft’s Windows operating system. Various versions of the software have spread widely around the globe since October, mostly outside the United States because there are more computers overseas running unpatched, pirated Windows. (The program does not infect Macintosh or Linux-based computers.)

My friend Helios has, in countless blog entries, conferred a marvelous rhetorical question: Why would you ever buy a product that doesn’t work properly until you buy another product?! If shelling out the dough for Windows, and putting up with its insecurities, instabilities and invasions of privacy wasn’t bad enough, users end up needing antivirus software to keep their Windows PCs happy - at least until the virus authors up the ante:

It is possible to detect and remove Conficker using commercial antivirus tools offered by many companies. However, the most recent version of the [worm] has a significantly improved capacity to remove commercial antivirus software and to turn off Microsoft’s security update service. It can also block communications with Web services provided by security companies to update their products. It even systematically opens holes in firewalls in an effort to improve its communication with other infected computers.

It takes some powerful emotions, rationalizations and denials for people to tolerate prolonged exposure to the inexcusable - whether it’s bad working conditions, abusive relationships or disobedient computers. Yet, for some reason, the computing public always takes the Pied Piper from Redmond back - despite the wide availability of superior, and in many cases free, alternatives. Alternatives that don’t fall prey to evil nasties like Conficker. In many unacceptable situations, the solution stares the victim in the face at every turn - but before you can take that first step toward freedom, you’ve got to accept that it’s out there, and that you deserve better.

Enough is Enough: Annoying blog trends

Despite the flurry of activity here since last November, I’ve managed to let the better part of March go by without a single post … so I figured now’s as good a time as any to chat about a few trends I’ve been noticing lately in the blogosphere. These trends have been annoying me. Maybe I’m not the only one they’ve been annoying?

1. Multiple-page entries
One of the nicest things about web pages is the fact that they can be as long or short as their content needs them to be. What’s the point of splitting your blog entry into 4 pages?! Not only does this annoy me when I have to locate the “next page” button, it interrupts the flow of your entry and messes up those who might actually want to print the thing out onto something that doesn’t have infinitely-variable length: a sheet of paper.

2. Registration-required comments
Don’t make me jump through hoops to comment on your blog. Moderating comments is all well-and-good (heck, we do that here at daverea.com for first-time posters) but demanding that commenters complete a registration form and wait for a confirmation e-mail is annoying. Not to mention by the time I’ve gone through all the hassle of registering, I’ve probably forgotten what I was going to write in my comment in the first place…

3. Lists of little-known Linux apps
Why is everyone publishing lists of obscure Linux programs that “you absolutely must try” all of a sudden? Did someone on the blogosphere put out a call for every grammatically-challenged geek to publicly extol the virtues of their favorite apps - as long as no one else knows about them? Enough already.

4. Hyperbolic, backwards titles
This week alone, the following titles came across my feedreader: “Firefox May Already be Dead”, “Command Line Terror!”, “Top 10 Reasons I’ll Never Use Ubuntu”, “Programming languages that melt your brain”… And the list goes on. In every case, the content of the entry in question actually contradicts the title - which leads me to believe it was nothing but an eye-catcher to begin with. Call me old-fashioned, but I like to think the headlines we author should reflect the credibility we seek. I’m tired of “X is Dead, Long Live X” titles, and I’m tired of hyped-up, sensational headlines that lead to blog entries whose only extravagance is in their mundanity.

Think we can live without these? I thought so.

Next Page »